Leicester
Flat Turf
Oadby, Leicestershire · a stiff, stamina-testing regional oval
Right-Handed
Downhill-then-Uphill
Leicester also stages National Hunt racing. Read the National Hunt racecourse guide →
How does Leicester ride?
Track Character
Leicester is a right-handed oval of roughly 1m6f (1¾ miles), with a separate straight course of 7 furlongs joining the round course 4½f from the finish — used for every race up to and including seven furlongs, with the mile and further starting on the round course. That straight runs downhill to halfway, climbs for about two furlongs and then levels out for roughly the final furlong and a half; because it joins the round course 4½f out, every race here is settled over the same climb-and-level finish. It’s a stiff test at any time of year, and a particularly searching one for two-year-olds early in the season.
Leicester’s dates get reported as a dispute, but they are four separate milestones rather than rival claims. The earliest documented racing in the town is an entry in the borough Chamberlain’s Accounts for 1603, recording money spent on sack and sugar “given to the gentlemen at the horse-running”; the annual September meetings were later held on the Corporation’s land at Abbey Meadows, and moved to St Mary’s Fields in 1742 after repeated flooding. The racecourse itself dates its establishment to 1773 at Victoria Park, and the move to the current Oadby site came in 1883, which has hosted racing ever since. The track is independently owned by Leicester Racecourse Company Ltd — not part of Jockey Club Racecourses, a common misconception given the company the course keeps on the Midlands circuit.
Course Facts
- Founded Separate milestones, not rival claims — racing documented in the town from 1603 (Abbey Meadows, then St Mary’s Fields from 1742), the racecourse’s own establishment date 1773 at Victoria Park
- Current site Oadby, since 1883
- Ownership Leicester Racecourse Company Ltd — independently owned, not Jockey Club Racecourses
The Round Course
- Shape Right-handed oval, approximately 1m6f
- Profile Shares the straight’s closing 4½f — a climb of roughly two furlongs, then level for about the last 1½f
- Test A stiff stamina examination, notably tough on early-season two-year-olds
The Straight Course
- Up to 7f A separate seven-furlong straight, joining the round course about 4½f out, stages every race up to and including seven furlongs — the mile and beyond start on the round course
- Draw A modest low-draw lean at 6f — two published samples agree on the direction and neither calls it strong — firming up as the ground eases
- Soft-ground quirk The stands’-side rail can be a marked advantage when the ground rides soft
Calendar & Notable Races
- King Richard III Cup Class 2 handicap, 6f, April — the Leicestershire Stakes was renamed after Richard III in 2013, the year remains dug up in a Leicester car park in 2012 were confirmed as his; the BHA left that Listed race out of the 2023 programme and Leicester replaced it with this handicap, run over a mile in 2023 and 2024 and over 6f in 2025 and 2026
- Flockton Grey scandal A notorious 1982 betting fraud: a three-year-old was substituted for the intended two-year-old runner, leading to owner Ken Richardson’s 25-year ban
When are the big meetings at Leicester?
Leicester’s most infamous day came on 29 March 1982, when a horse running as the two-year-old Flockton Grey won a maiden by a distance — far too easily. The winning margin, and race photographs showing a mouthful of teeth far too developed for a juvenile, exposed one of British racing’s most notorious “ring-ins”: a three-year-old, Good Hand, had been substituted for the intended runner. Bookmakers refused to pay out, a police inquiry followed, and owner Ken Richardson was convicted of conspiracy to defraud and warned off for an unprecedented 25 years.
The Flat card is otherwise built from solid handicaps, headed each April by the King Richard III Cup. That race was previously known as the Leicestershire Stakes and took its present name in 2013, the year the remains dug out of a Leicester car park in August 2012 were confirmed as the king’s; it was a Listed contest over seven furlongs until the BHA left it out of the black-type programme for 2023, and Leicester has run it as a handicap ever since — over a mile in 2023 and 2024, then as a Class 2 over six furlongs in 2025 and 2026. The racing itself is a stiff test: the downhill-then-uphill round course and long, climbing straight ask a genuine stamina question, and horses flattered by sharper tracks are regularly found out.
Does the draw matter at Leicester?
Strong bias — material handicapping factor
Moderate lean — worth noting
Broadly fair — not a primary factor
Two soft-ground observations sit side by side here and they are not the same finding. The draw figures are stall numbers, and drawbias.com places the low side on the far rail; Jason Weaver’s soft-ground advantage is the stands’ side. Before leaning on either, check where the stalls have been set and where the field actually races in the day’s first straight-course contest.
Do front-runners win at Leicester?
Run Style and Draw at Leicester
Won 15 of 44 races
21.6%, IV 1.91 (2009 on)
3 wins from 64
PRB 0.34, par 0.50
Bars show how each group has fared, not how often it appears. The 5f row is Renham’s 2009-on sample; the other three are his 2021-25 study of handicaps with eight or more runners.
Away from the minimum trip the draw and the run style stop reading separately. In that 2021-25 work, the early leader won 15 of 44 round-mile handicaps, and high-drawn hold-up horses over the same course and distance had the worst record of the twenty combinations he examined — a percentage of rivals beaten of 0.34 against a par of 0.50, with runners drawn 9 or higher and held up 0 from 28. The straight 6f is on the same list: high-drawn hold-up runners won 3 of 64, and from stall 10 or higher they were 0 from 40 held up and 0 from 34 in mid-division, 74 consecutive losers between them. We have found no published run-style read for the straight 7f.
Which trainers and jockeys win most at Leicester?
| Trainer | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Fahey, R A | 378 | 62 | 16.40% | 137 | 36.24% | 1.08 | +75.45 |
| 2 Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 365 | 48 | 13.15% | 120 | 32.88% | 0.88 | -60.94 |
| 3 Beckett, R M | 205 | 41 | 20.00% | 77 | 37.56% | 0.94 | +17.09 |
| 4 Varian, Roger | 197 | 41 | 20.81% | 90 | 45.69% | 0.88 | -32.21 |
| 5 Evans, P D | 372 | 39 | 10.48% | 114 | 30.65% | 0.88 | -109.69 |
| 6 Cox, C G | 278 | 39 | 14.03% | 103 | 37.05% | 0.91 | -42.11 |
| 7 Gosden, J H M | 173 | 39 | 22.54% | 85 | 49.13% | 0.92 | -1.51 |
| 8 Haggas, W J | 174 | 36 | 20.69% | 76 | 43.68% | 0.84 | -25.08 |
| 9 Carroll, A W | 332 | 35 | 10.54% | 89 | 26.81% | 1.07 | -91.29 |
| 10 Hills, Charles | 195 | 35 | 17.95% | 74 | 37.95% | 0.98 | +1.96 |
| 11 Appleby, M | 352 | 32 | 9.09% | 82 | 23.30% | 0.80 | +13.16 |
| 12 Suroor, Saeed Bin | 120 | 31 | 25.83% | 63 | 52.50% | 0.90 | -17.22 |
| 13 O’Meara, D | 191 | 28 | 14.66% | 71 | 37.17% | 0.92 | -35.79 |
| 14 Charlton, Roger/Harry | 93 | 27 | 29.03% | 55 | 59.14% | 1.27 | +8.24 |
| 15 Easterby, T D | 225 | 26 | 11.56% | 70 | 31.11% | 0.88 | -24.88 |
| 16 Fanshawe, J R | 137 | 26 | 18.98% | 54 | 39.42% | 1.06 | +12.90 |
| 17 Dunlop, E A L | 182 | 25 | 13.74% | 60 | 32.97% | 1.10 | +50.43 |
| 18 Balding, A M | 210 | 23 | 10.95% | 67 | 31.90% | 0.68 | -76.19 |
| 19 Bell, M L W | 197 | 23 | 11.68% | 62 | 31.47% | 0.79 | -76.69 |
| 20 Ryan, K A | 194 | 23 | 11.86% | 68 | 35.05% | 0.75 | -47.94 |
| Jockey | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Sousa, Silvestre De | 302 | 62 | 20.53% | 121 | 40.07% | 1.08 | +6.60 |
| 2 Moore, Ryan | 220 | 60 | 27.27% | 116 | 52.73% | 0.97 | -16.49 |
| 3 Buick, William | 233 | 52 | 22.32% | 112 | 48.07% | 0.86 | -23.10 |
| 4 Doyle, James | 219 | 44 | 20.09% | 87 | 39.73% | 1.04 | +35.79 |
| 5 Atzeni, Andrea | 238 | 36 | 15.13% | 81 | 34.03% | 0.89 | -31.67 |
| 6 Murphy, Oisin | 200 | 34 | 17.00% | 83 | 41.50% | 0.84 | -56.02 |
| 7 Probert, David | 262 | 32 | 12.21% | 75 | 28.63% | 0.94 | -33.07 |
| 8 Marquand, Tom | 253 | 32 | 12.65% | 89 | 35.18% | 0.82 | -92.86 |
| 9 Ryan, Rossa | 177 | 31 | 17.51% | 64 | 36.16% | 0.94 | -20.73 |
| 10 Levey, S M | 174 | 28 | 16.09% | 59 | 33.91% | 1.19 | +3.26 |
| 11 Doyle, Hollie | 191 | 27 | 14.14% | 66 | 34.56% | 0.79 | -58.91 |
| 12 Spencer, Jamie | 165 | 27 | 16.36% | 69 | 41.82% | 0.82 | -59.57 |
| 13 Cosgrave, Pat | 174 | 24 | 13.79% | 59 | 33.91% | 0.82 | -74.16 |
| 14 Muscutt, D | 160 | 24 | 15.00% | 45 | 28.13% | 0.98 | -29.07 |
| 15 Mitchell, Jack | 122 | 24 | 19.67% | 44 | 36.07% | 1.30 | +42.24 |
| 16 Hornby, Rob | 174 | 23 | 13.22% | 57 | 32.76% | 0.94 | +61.86 |
| 17 Egan, David | 176 | 22 | 12.50% | 56 | 31.82% | 0.84 | -52.25 |
| 18 Havlin, Robert | 147 | 22 | 14.97% | 51 | 34.69% | 1.04 | -22.17 |
| 19 Kingscote, Richard | 206 | 21 | 10.19% | 70 | 33.98% | 0.73 | -86.47 |
Which sires do best at Leicester?
| Sire | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Kodiac | 391 | 49 | 12.53% | 122 | 31.20% | 0.93 | -77.56 |
| 2 Acclamation | 276 | 39 | 14.13% | 91 | 32.97% | 0.93 | -73.18 |
| 3 Dubawi (IRE) | 165 | 37 | 22.42% | 79 | 47.88% | 0.98 | -8.69 |
| 4 Invincible Spirit (IRE) | 253 | 35 | 13.83% | 93 | 36.76% | 0.84 | -6.31 |
| 5 Dark Angel (IRE) | 307 | 34 | 11.07% | 96 | 31.27% | 0.72 | -133.19 |
| 6 Oasis Dream | 255 | 34 | 13.33% | 85 | 33.33% | 0.82 | -100.86 |
| 7 Exceed And Excel (AUS) | 228 | 30 | 13.16% | 65 | 28.51% | 0.88 | -60.39 |
| 8 Cape Cross (IRE) | 139 | 27 | 19.42% | 54 | 38.85% | 1.10 | -9.45 |
| 9 Lope De Vega (IRE) | 130 | 27 | 20.77% | 50 | 38.46% | 1.11 | -4.41 |
| 10 Iffraaj | 185 | 26 | 14.05% | 49 | 26.49% | 1.07 | -21.84 |
| 11 Sea The Stars (IRE) | 102 | 26 | 25.49% | 48 | 47.06% | 1.13 | +3.39 |
| 12 Dandy Man (IRE) | 197 | 24 | 12.18% | 70 | 35.53% | 0.90 | -20.51 |
| 13 Kyllachy | 192 | 24 | 12.50% | 65 | 33.85% | 0.93 | -41.11 |
| 14 Pastoral Pursuits | 145 | 22 | 15.17% | 50 | 34.48% | 1.08 | -3.45 |
| 15 Dansili | 124 | 21 | 16.94% | 46 | 37.10% | 0.84 | -45.30 |
| 16 Pivotal | 128 | 20 | 15.63% | 47 | 36.72% | 0.87 | -33.14 |
| 17 Teofilo (IRE) | 87 | 20 | 22.99% | 39 | 44.83% | 1.07 | -1.03 |
| 18 Showcasing | 188 | 17 | 9.04% | 49 | 26.06% | 0.80 | -85.45 |
| 19 Shamardal (USA) | 132 | 17 | 12.88% | 41 | 31.06% | 0.75 | -42.11 |
| 20 Mayson | 126 | 17 | 13.49% | 42 | 33.33% | 0.95 | -40.29 |
Betting Tips for Leicester Flat Turf
5f Is Kinder to Closers Than Most Sprint Tracks
Front-runners still hold the edge at the minimum trip — 21.6% and an Impact Value of 1.91 in Renham’s 2009-on sample. Hold-up horses won 9.0% against a 6.7% national average, which is why Leicester makes his best-for-closers list, but their Impact Value is 0.79. Better than most 5f tracks for a closer, not level with the leaders.
A Low Draw Helps at 6f, Modestly
Both published samples point the same way — IV 1.35 v 0.77 across 2009-19, and 34 of 64 races to stalls 1-4 across 2016-22 — and the second calls it “not a huge bias, but a nagging one”. It firms up as the ground eases.
Respect the Downhill-Then-Uphill Test
Downhill to halfway, then a climb of about two furlongs before the ground levels for the last furlong and a half — a proper stamina examination, and one that still leaves a flat run to the line.
Ryan Moore Strikes Hardest, But the Market Knows
Moore rides 60 winners from 220 Leicester mounts at 27.27%, the best strike rate in the rider table — but at A/E 0.97 the market has him covered and blind backing is £16.49 down. Silvestre De Sousa (62 from 302 at 20.53%, A/E 1.08) is the better mix of volume and A/E.
Fahey Leads, and Two Smaller Yards Beat Their Prices
Richard Fahey tops the trainer table on winners (62 from 378) at A/E 1.08 for a +£75.45 level-stakes profit, the biggest in the top 20. A W Carroll’s runners won slightly more often than their SPs implied (A/E 1.07) on a 10.54% strike, though level stakes are still £91.29 down. Ed Dunlop (25 from 182, A/E 1.10, +£50.43) and Mrs P Sly (19 from 90, A/E 1.53, +£102.88) have both beaten SP expectation on smaller books, Sly by the widest margin of anyone the page names bar Adrian Nicholls. Clive Cox (39 from 278, A/E 0.91) has run close to his prices.
The Sire Table Is Flat at the Top
Kodiac heads the winners (49 from 391) at A/E 0.93 and nothing at the top of the table clears its price by much. The best A/E of the twenty is Sea The Stars, 1.13 from 102 runners and the table’s only profit at +£3.39, then Lope De Vega (20.77% from 130, A/E 1.11) and Cape Cross (19.42% from 139, A/E 1.10). Outside the top 20, on smaller samples, Territories has won 15 of 66 (22.73%) at A/E 1.47 for +£25.99 and Adaay 14 of 75 (18.67%) at A/E 1.31 for +£35.93 — though they are not the highest A/E figures down there either, with Captain Rio (1.65 from 49) and Clodovil (1.52 from 77) above them.
Michael Appleby Pays, But Only Just
Appleby is 32 winners from 352 Leicester runners at 9.09% and shows a small +£13.16 level-stakes profit, but at A/E 0.80 the market still has him covered — that profit comes from a handful of bigger prices, not a reliable edge.
High Draw Plus Held Up Is the Pairing to Avoid
In Renham’s 2021-25 study of handicaps with eight or more runners, high-drawn hold-up horses won 3 of 64 over the straight 6f, and from stall 10 or higher they were 0 from 40 held up and 0 from 34 in mid-division. Over the round mile the same cohort had the worst record of the twenty course-and-distance combinations he examined, a percentage of rivals beaten of 0.34 against a 0.50 par, and 0 from 28 from stall 9 or higher.
Dark Angel Has the Weakest Sire Figures Here
Dark Angel has the lowest A/E in the top 20 — 0.72 across 307 runners for £133.19 of losses — with Oasis Dream (0.82), Invincible Spirit (0.84), Kingman (0.77 from 85) and Frankel (0.87 from 77) also below par. The table pools both courses, every trip, juveniles and older horses and sixteen seasons, so a sire figure here is a tiebreaker rather than a reason to put a line through a well-handicapped runner.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming a single draw bias applies at every Leicester trip. The low-draw lean is specific to the straight 6f, and even there both published samples are modest — 5f and 7f show little consistent bias either way.
- Backing David Evans or William Haggas on reputation. Evans carries the trainer table’s biggest level-stakes loss, £109.69 down at A/E 0.88, though the lowest A/E of the twenty is Balding’s 0.68. Haggas pairs a healthy 20.69% strike with an A/E of 0.84, so his runners have won less often than their prices implied. A W Carroll is the other way round — only a 10.54% strike from 332 runners, but an A/E of 1.07.
- Reading run style without the draw. Over the round mile the early leader won 15 of 44 handicaps in 2021-25, while hold-up horses drawn high were the worst-performing combination of the twenty Renham examined; the straight 6f punishes the same pairing. Neither the draw nor the run style tells you much here on its own.
Leicester Racecourse FAQs
Is there a draw bias at Leicester?
Who owns Leicester Racecourse?
What is the King Richard III Cup?
What was the Flockton Grey scandal?
Nearby Tracks
Nottingham
Left-handed galloping track in the Midlands circuit.
Warwick
Tight, undulating right-hander, jumps-only since 2014.
Newmarket
The home of British Flat racing — Rowley Mile and July Course.
Want the thinking behind Leicester turf bets?
FormDial posts every selection before the off with its full reasoning: the angle, the price, the logic. See how course analysis feeds into real selections.
The Trackside Companion is your day at the races, written to order — every race on your meeting’s card broken down, plus this track’s draw, angles and people distilled from the guide you’ve just read. Order at least a week before your raceday.
Plan your raceday →