Chepstow
National Hunt
Piercefield, Monmouthshire · home of the Coral Welsh Grand National
Turf
Left-Handed
Severe Undulations
Track Breakdown
Chepstow’s jumps course is nested inside its left-handed Flat circuit, giving it tighter, sharper bends than the wider turns used on the Flat. The severe undulations that define the whole site are, if anything, more consequential over jumps: several sources independently describe the view from the winning post as resembling “the ocean with large waves and swells,” with the highest point on the back straight and a further uphill section on the home bend. The run-in compounds the challenge β 250 yards, and notably steep downhill, a widely cited cause of jumping errors at the final fence since horses arrive there at real speed.
Chepstow opened in 1926 and staged its first jump racing the following March. The Welsh Grand National β originally run at Ely Racecourse in Cardiff from 1895, then Newport from 1948 β moved to Chepstow in 1949, cementing the track’s National Hunt identity ever since. On quick ground the course rides fast and true; on soft or heavy it “strings horses out like washing,” giving Chepstow a reputation as a winter mudlark’s track and a recognised stamina proving-ground ahead of Cheltenham and Aintree.
The Chase Course
- Circuit Left-handed, nested inside the Flat course with sharper bends, ~2m per circuit
- Fences 11 per circuit β two open ditches and a water jump; five of the eleven are sited in the home straight itself
- Run-in 250 yards, steeply downhill β a well-documented cause of jumping errors at the final fence
- Run style Severe undulations reward genuine stamina; front-runners hold a strong, well-quantified edge (see Pace Bias below)
The Welsh Grand National Course
- Distance Extended in 2019 from 3m5f110y to the current 3m6Β½f, moving the start further back and adding one extra fence β 23 in total
- Not a separate track The “extended” course is the standard chase circuit run further back from the same finish, not a structurally different layout
- Sponsorship Coral has backed the race since 1973 β the longest-running sponsorship in jump racing
The Racing Calendar
The Number That Matters
Chepstow has one of the starkest, most thoroughly quantified pace biases in British jump racing. In handicap chases, 68 of 96 winners (71%) either led or raced close to the pace β from just 47% of runners. Front-runners’ win rate sits at 25% against only 5.7% for hold-up horses, an edge of more than four times, with an A/E value of 2.16 for leaders against below 1.00 for every other running style.
Run Style Bias — Handicap Chases
25% Strong (A/E 2.16)
46% Strong
5.7% Very Weak
The likely explanation is structural: five of the eleven fences sit in the home straight, with the first part downhill, which rewards a horse racing prominently far more than one held up for a late challenge. This is one of the clearest, best-evidenced pace angles anywhere in this guide series β treat it accordingly.
Top Trainers & Jockeys
| Trainer | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Nicholls, P F | 595 | 128 | 21.51% | 264 | 44.37% | 0.83 | -174.79 |
| 2 Williams, Evan | 711 | 85 | 11.95% | 209 | 29.40% | 0.95 | -23.91 |
| 3 Hobbs, P J / White, J | 463 | 83 | 17.93% | 196 | 42.33% | 1.02 | -29.62 |
| 4 Pipe, D E | 342 | 61 | 17.84% | 133 | 38.89% | 1.10 | +14.84 |
| 5 Twiston-Davies, N A | 322 | 46 | 14.29% | 117 | 36.34% | 0.94 | -40.61 |
| 6 Tizzard, C L | 388 | 45 | 11.60% | 124 | 31.96% | 0.78 | -146.24 |
| 7 Curtis, Miss Rebecca | 294 | 44 | 14.97% | 120 | 40.82% | 0.79 | -49.16 |
| 8 Williams, Miss Venetia | 369 | 43 | 11.65% | 117 | 31.71% | 0.81 | -124.92 |
| 9 O’Neill, Jonjo and AJ | 402 | 42 | 10.45% | 119 | 29.60% | 0.77 | -170.69 |
| 10 Skelton, Daniel | 339 | 41 | 12.09% | 124 | 36.58% | 0.77 | -106.40 |
| 11 Vaughan, Tim | 433 | 34 | 7.85% | 109 | 25.17% | 0.83 | -171.89 |
| 12 O’Brien, Fergal | 258 | 31 | 12.02% | 81 | 31.40% | 0.78 | -64.28 |
| 13 Mulholland, N P | 262 | 30 | 11.45% | 65 | 24.81% | 1.13 | -69.57 |
| 14 Bowen, Peter / Michael | 267 | 29 | 10.86% | 68 | 25.47% | 1.04 | -63.97 |
| 15 King, A | 193 | 26 | 13.47% | 76 | 39.38% | 0.83 | -75.21 |
| 16 Lacey, T | 134 | 26 | 19.40% | 57 | 42.54% | 1.08 | +47.84 |
| 17 Bailey, K C | 169 | 24 | 14.20% | 56 | 33.14% | 0.85 | -66.06 |
| 18 Scott, J | 193 | 23 | 11.92% | 63 | 32.64% | 1.02 | -58.04 |
| 19 George, T R | 195 | 22 | 11.28% | 62 | 31.79% | 0.81 | -107.91 |
| 20 Lavelle, Miss E C | 166 | 22 | 13.25% | 55 | 33.13% | 0.84 | -54.41 |
| Jockey | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Cobden, Harry | 316 | 72 | 22.78% | 132 | 41.77% | 0.94 | -70.01 |
| 2 Johnson, Richard | 342 | 71 | 20.76% | 167 | 48.83% | 1.06 | +20.44 |
| 3 Twiston-Davies, Sam | 363 | 56 | 15.43% | 138 | 38.02% | 0.83 | -132.48 |
| 4 Bowen, Sean P | 288 | 51 | 17.71% | 91 | 31.60% | 1.14 | +13.98 |
| 5 Wedge, Adam | 399 | 50 | 12.53% | 123 | 30.83% | 0.97 | -17.48 |
| 6 Scudamore, Tom | 297 | 48 | 16.16% | 109 | 36.70% | 1.00 | -48.78 |
| 7 O’Brien, T J | 261 | 36 | 13.79% | 84 | 32.18% | 1.09 | -38.93 |
| 8 Sheehan, Gavin | 207 | 36 | 17.39% | 75 | 36.23% | 1.09 | -7.02 |
| 9 Brennan, P J | 225 | 35 | 15.56% | 76 | 33.78% | 0.95 | +0.43 |
| 10 Skelton, Harry | 230 | 30 | 13.04% | 96 | 41.74% | 0.71 | -64.71 |
| 11 Jacob, Daryl | 183 | 26 | 14.21% | 63 | 34.43% | 0.81 | -70.91 |
| 12 Moloney, Paul | 173 | 26 | 15.03% | 55 | 31.79% | 1.24 | +82.36 |
| 13 Scholfield, Nick | 276 | 25 | 9.06% | 62 | 22.46% | 0.82 | -133.34 |
| 14 Jones, Ben R | 154 | 25 | 16.23% | 59 | 38.31% | 1.05 | +18.41 |
| 15 Best, J A | 303 | 24 | 7.92% | 63 | 20.79% | 0.99 | -115.77 |
| 16 Sheppard, Stan | 161 | 24 | 14.91% | 53 | 32.92% | 1.04 | -30.14 |
| 17 O’Neill, Jonjo (Jr) | 163 | 22 | 13.50% | 58 | 35.58% | 0.81 | -62.82 |
| 18 Coleman, A | 221 | 21 | 9.50% | 69 | 31.22% | 0.69 | -101.64 |
| 19 Williams, Lorcan | 136 | 20 | 14.71% | 47 | 34.56% | 1.08 | -49.92 |
| 20 Bellamy, Tom | 173 | 18 | 10.40% | 50 | 28.90% | 0.77 | -86.33 |
Top Sires
| Sire | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Flemensfirth (USA) | 435 | 67 | 15.40% | 159 | 36.55% | 1.05 | +96.49 |
| 2 Kayf Tara | 457 | 54 | 11.82% | 139 | 30.42% | 0.84 | -153.47 |
| 3 Oscar (IRE) | 331 | 48 | 14.50% | 108 | 32.63% | 1.01 | -45.63 |
| 4 Milan | 402 | 39 | 9.70% | 103 | 25.62% | 0.77 | -106.88 |
| 5 King’s Theatre (IRE) | 199 | 34 | 17.09% | 72 | 36.18% | 1.07 | -43.28 |
| 6 Shantou (USA) | 156 | 33 | 21.15% | 71 | 45.51% | 1.17 | -3.15 |
| 7 Westerner | 249 | 32 | 12.85% | 85 | 34.14% | 0.88 | -124.60 |
| 8 Stowaway | 160 | 25 | 15.62% | 54 | 33.75% | 1.14 | -30.17 |
| 9 Getaway (GER) | 260 | 23 | 8.85% | 69 | 26.54% | 0.72 | -105.27 |
| 10 Presenting | 259 | 23 | 8.88% | 77 | 29.73% | 0.67 | -111.46 |
| 11 Beneficial | 229 | 23 | 10.04% | 63 | 27.51% | 0.75 | -34.77 |
| 12 Midnight Legend | 219 | 23 | 10.50% | 58 | 26.48% | 0.85 | -47.10 |
| 13 Old Vic | 165 | 22 | 13.33% | 55 | 33.33% | 0.89 | -22.59 |
| 14 Mahler | 200 | 20 | 10.00% | 66 | 33.00% | 0.79 | -113.02 |
| 15 Alflora (IRE) | 175 | 20 | 11.43% | 54 | 30.86% | 1.23 | +32.92 |
| 16 Shirocco (GER) | 127 | 17 | 13.39% | 36 | 28.35% | 0.99 | -50.02 |
| 17 Kapgarde (FR) | 130 | 16 | 12.31% | 44 | 33.85% | 0.80 | -76.81 |
| 18 Soldier Of Fortune (IRE) | 122 | 16 | 13.11% | 36 | 29.51% | 0.90 | -58.61 |
| 19 Martaline | 109 | 16 | 14.68% | 37 | 33.94% | 0.89 | -40.21 |
| 20 Black Sam Bellamy (IRE) | 166 | 15 | 9.04% | 43 | 25.90% | 0.76 | -61.68 |
Betting Angles
Lean Toward the Front at Chepstow
71% of chase winners here either led or raced close to the pace, from just 47% of runners β one of the strongest, best-documented front-running biases anywhere.
Watch for Errors at the Downhill Last
The steep 250-yard downhill run-in is a well-known cause of jumping mistakes at the final fence, since horses arrive at real speed.
Sam Thomas Is the Profitable Trainer Angle
A level-stakes profit of +Β£20.96 from 19 winners (24.1%, A/E 1.05), ahead of higher-volume names on pure return.
Harry Cobden Leads the Jockey Table
41 winners over the last five seasons β the most of any rider β though at A/E 0.89 and a level-stakes loss, that is volume leading the table rather than value.
Evan Williams Knows the Home Ground
The Welsh-based trainer’s deep local ties produced Secret Reprieve’s Welsh National win and Coole Cody’s Paddy Power and December Gold Cups.
Respect the Undulations, Not Just the Distance
Described as resembling “the ocean with large waves and swells,” Chepstow’s severe undulations shape form here as much as the obstacles do.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Backing hold-up horses on reputation alone. The data here is unusually stark β leaders and prominent racers have won 71% of chases from just 47% of runners, with hold-up horses winning barely 5.7% of the time.
- Treating the Welsh Grand National as run over a separate circuit. The 2019 extension moved the start further back on the same standard chase course, adding one extra fence β it isn’t a different track.
- Assuming the Welsh Champion Hurdle’s current grade is settled. Sources conflict on its black-type status; treat any claimed Listed status with caution.
Chepstow Racecourse FAQs
Is there a genuine pace bias at Chepstow?
How is the Welsh Grand National course different from a normal Chepstow chase?
Why do horses fall at the last fence so often at Chepstow?
Who owns Chepstow Racecourse?
Other Jumps Tracks
Aintree
Home of the Grand National β Mildmay and National courses.
Cheltenham
Old Course and New Course β the home of jump racing.
Kempton Park
Sharp, flat right-hander β home of the King George.
Want the thinking behind National Hunt bets?
FormDial posts every selection before the off with its full reasoning: the angle, the price, the logic. See how course analysis feeds into real selections.
The Trackside Companion is your day at the races, written to order — every race on your meeting’s card broken down, plus this track’s draw, angles and people distilled from the guide you’ve just read. Order at least a week before your raceday.
Plan your raceday →