Doncaster
National Hunt
Town Moor, Doncaster, South Yorkshire · home of the Great Yorkshire Chase
Turf
Left-Handed
Galloping
Track Breakdown
Doncaster’s jumps course shares its footprint with the Flat track on the wide-open expanse of Town Moor — left-handed, largely flat, and galloping in character, with a circuit of around one mile seven and a half furlongs. It’s a fair, sweeping track without the tight turns or steep gradients that catch horses out at sharper circuits, and the going rides reliably thanks to good natural drainage.
That doesn’t make it a soft touch for jumping. The back straight carries four fences — a water jump first up, then an open ditch third — before the course rises through a short uphill section carrying three more fences, the middle one another open ditch. Four plain fences follow after the turn for home, finishing over a run-in of roughly 220 yards. At The Races’ course guide is direct about the effect: despite being “surprisingly” fair for such a galloping track, the sequencing — particularly the last ditch — makes Doncaster “quite a tough track for a novice chaser,” in the words of jockey Mick Fitzgerald.
National Hunt racing at Doncaster has a more interrupted history than the Flat side suggests. Jumping was suspended in 1911 and didn’t return until December 1946, a 35-year gap driven by a post-war “spirit of optimism” rather than any single decisive event. The Great Yorkshire Chase — now the track’s signature jumps race — was meant to launch the following year but was snowed off, finally running for the first time in 1948. Its £2,100 prize fund that year was worth more than the Cheltenham Gold Cup’s at the time.
The Jumps Course
- Circuit Left-handed, ~1m7½f, flat and galloping, shared footprint with the Flat track
- Fences 11 per circuit — water jump 1st, open ditch 3rd in the back straight; another open ditch mid-way through the uphill section; 4 plain fences after the turn for home
- Hurdles 7 flights per circuit
- Run-in Around 220 yards from the last obstacle
- Run style A fair, galloping test that rewards a horse jumping cleanly and at pace rather than punishing a particular running style outright
Track & History
- NH suspended 1911 to December 1946 — a 35-year gap before jumps racing resumed
- Great Yorkshire Chase First run 1948 (a planned 1947 debut was snowed off); Cool Customer’s winning weight of 12st 7lb remains the race record
- Redevelopment £34m rebuild in 2006–07 replaced the 1960s grandstand with a new five-tier stand
- A first for Britain Doncaster became the first British racecourse to install artificial hurdles (EASYFIX Equine)
- NH season Roughly 11 jumps racedays a year, November to March, alongside the separate Flat programme
The Racing Calendar
The Number That Matters
Doncaster doesn’t carry the kind of sharp-turn or short-run-in reputation that produces a strong, well-documented pace bias — course guides consistently describe it as a fair, galloping track without the geography to hand a decisive edge to front-runners or hold-up horses. The one genuine complication is the fence sequencing: with a water jump and open ditch inside the first three obstacles and another ditch on the uphill section, jumping cleanly and efficiently through that stretch matters more here than pure early gallop.
Nothing in the published research quantifies a running-style split for Doncaster’s jumps course with hard percentages — unlike some sharper tracks, no course-specific strike-rate data surfaced for front-runners versus hold-up types here. Treat the page’s Run Style Bias section below as a reasoned, qualitative read on the track’s known character rather than a data-backed statistic, and don’t apply the kind of confident pace angle that would suit a tighter course.
Run Style Bias — Chases (qualitative)
─ Slight Edge
─ Fair
─ Fair
─ Stamina rewarded
The near-even spread above reflects genuine course character, not a data gap being papered over — Doncaster’s fair, galloping layout simply doesn’t hand a structural advantage to any one running style the way a tight, short-run-in track does. The clean-jumping requirement around the water jump and open ditches is the more reliable handicapping angle than position alone.
Top Trainers & Jockeys
| Trainer | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Henderson, N J | 314 | 88 | 28.03% | 164 | 52.23% | 0.96 | -5.08 |
| 2 King, A | 345 | 54 | 15.65% | 130 | 37.68% | 0.81 | -55.26 |
| 3 Nicholls, P F | 195 | 45 | 23.08% | 77 | 39.49% | 0.93 | -50.13 |
| 4 McCain Jnr, D | 306 | 40 | 13.07% | 103 | 33.66% | 0.86 | +69.36 |
| 5 Skelton, Daniel | 252 | 34 | 13.49% | 83 | 32.94% | 0.80 | -80.01 |
| 6 Pauling, Ben | 195 | 31 | 15.90% | 60 | 30.77% | 0.90 | +2.13 |
| 7 Bailey, K C | 131 | 28 | 21.37% | 48 | 36.64% | 1.03 | +13.31 |
| 8 Lavelle, Miss E C | 121 | 27 | 22.31% | 50 | 41.32% | 1.15 | +0.35 |
| 9 Longsdon, C E | 230 | 25 | 10.87% | 74 | 32.17% | 0.77 | -50.13 |
| 10 Twiston-Davies, N A | 185 | 25 | 13.51% | 53 | 28.65% | 0.88 | -63.93 |
| 11 Richards, N G | 155 | 24 | 15.48% | 55 | 35.48% | 1.17 | +25.49 |
| 12 O’Neill, Jonjo and AJ | 223 | 23 | 10.31% | 58 | 26.01% | 0.83 | -59.45 |
| 13 Williams, Ian | 176 | 22 | 12.50% | 45 | 25.57% | 1.02 | -8.73 |
| 14 Reveley, K G | 162 | 22 | 13.58% | 63 | 38.89% | 1.09 | -21.82 |
| 15 Greenall, O / Guerriero, J | 118 | 22 | 18.64% | 41 | 34.75% | 1.31 | +2.75 |
| 16 Mulholland, N P | 122 | 21 | 17.21% | 42 | 34.43% | 1.10 | -10.32 |
| 17 O’Brien, Fergal | 118 | 17 | 14.41% | 41 | 34.75% | 0.83 | -16.14 |
| 18 Smith, Mrs S J | 159 | 15 | 9.43% | 47 | 29.56% | 0.73 | -50.87 |
| 19 King, N B | 136 | 15 | 11.03% | 39 | 28.68% | 0.97 | -29.93 |
| 20 George, T R | 133 | 15 | 11.28% | 42 | 31.58% | 0.70 | -4.21 |
| Jockey | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Hughes, Brian | 442 | 57 | 12.90% | 154 | 34.84% | 0.80 | -117.41 |
| 2 Bass, David | 133 | 31 | 23.31% | 52 | 39.10% | 1.11 | +35.17 |
| 3 Boinville, Nico | 113 | 30 | 26.55% | 48 | 42.48% | 0.98 | -4.35 |
| 4 Reveley, James | 172 | 28 | 16.28% | 73 | 42.44% | 1.23 | +63.89 |
| 5 Brennan, P J | 124 | 26 | 20.97% | 51 | 41.13% | 1.15 | +81.21 |
| 6 Brooke, Henry | 178 | 25 | 14.04% | 60 | 33.71% | 1.20 | -2.38 |
| 7 Twiston-Davies, Sam | 170 | 20 | 11.76% | 50 | 29.41% | 0.71 | -51.51 |
| 8 Bellamy, Tom | 152 | 20 | 13.16% | 42 | 27.63% | 0.79 | -57.18 |
| 9 Quinlan, Jack | 124 | 20 | 16.13% | 38 | 30.65% | 1.16 | -25.41 |
| 10 Bowen, James C | 105 | 20 | 19.05% | 48 | 45.71% | 0.91 | -33.37 |
| 11 Tinkler, Andrew | 95 | 20 | 21.05% | 31 | 32.63% | 1.18 | +40.73 |
| 12 Skelton, Harry | 125 | 19 | 15.20% | 45 | 36.00% | 0.76 | -44.63 |
| 13 Aspell, Leighton | 102 | 19 | 18.63% | 40 | 39.22% | 1.12 | -15.42 |
| 14 Coleman, A | 113 | 18 | 15.93% | 38 | 33.63% | 0.90 | -40.83 |
| 15 Scholfield, Nick | 95 | 18 | 18.95% | 30 | 31.58% | 1.17 | +26.42 |
| 16 Costello, Dougie | 93 | 18 | 19.35% | 30 | 32.26% | 1.42 | +47.66 |
| 17 Quinlan, Sean | 168 | 17 | 10.12% | 53 | 31.55% | 0.86 | +29.88 |
| 18 Johnson, Richard | 120 | 17 | 14.17% | 45 | 37.50% | 0.74 | -17.95 |
| 19 Jacob, Daryl | 107 | 17 | 15.89% | 34 | 31.78% | 0.82 | -38.18 |
| 20 Fehily, Noel | 91 | 17 | 18.68% | 28 | 30.77% | 1.16 | +14.55 |
Top Sires
| Sire | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Presenting | 274 | 42 | 15.33% | 91 | 33.21% | 0.96 | -66.67 |
| 2 Oscar (IRE) | 172 | 30 | 17.44% | 62 | 36.05% | 0.93 | -64.09 |
| 3 Milan | 190 | 26 | 13.68% | 59 | 31.05% | 0.88 | +37.50 |
| 4 Getaway (GER) | 171 | 24 | 14.04% | 53 | 30.99% | 0.97 | -34.90 |
| 5 Westerner | 138 | 24 | 17.39% | 52 | 37.68% | 1.13 | -11.55 |
| 6 Midnight Legend | 186 | 23 | 12.37% | 63 | 33.87% | 0.80 | -61.24 |
| 7 Kayf Tara | 215 | 22 | 10.23% | 58 | 26.98% | 0.71 | -87.71 |
| 8 King’s Theatre (IRE) | 170 | 21 | 12.35% | 51 | 30.00% | 0.76 | -60.60 |
| 9 Shirocco (GER) | 115 | 21 | 18.26% | 38 | 33.04% | 1.31 | +20.59 |
| 10 Beneficial | 166 | 20 | 12.05% | 44 | 26.51% | 0.82 | -79.58 |
| 11 Flemensfirth (USA) | 183 | 19 | 10.38% | 53 | 28.96% | 0.68 | -118.78 |
| 12 Doyen (IRE) | 86 | 19 | 22.09% | 35 | 40.70% | 1.20 | +11.51 |
| 13 Gold Well | 84 | 17 | 20.24% | 34 | 40.48% | 1.22 | +40.21 |
| 14 Shantou (USA) | 91 | 13 | 14.29% | 23 | 25.27% | 0.83 | -45.93 |
| 15 Yeats (IRE) | 133 | 12 | 9.02% | 34 | 25.56% | 0.70 | -43.50 |
| 16 Soldier Of Fortune (IRE) | 60 | 12 | 20.00% | 27 | 45.00% | 1.17 | +27.58 |
| 17 Kalanisi (IRE) | 65 | 11 | 16.92% | 17 | 26.15% | 1.12 | -15.14 |
| 18 Martaline | 63 | 11 | 17.46% | 20 | 31.75% | 1.00 | -12.30 |
| 19 Mount Nelson | 54 | 11 | 20.37% | 20 | 37.04% | 1.39 | +3.46 |
| 20 Mahler | 110 | 10 | 9.09% | 39 | 35.45% | 0.62 | -47.24 |
Betting Angles
Clean jumping matters more than running style
With a water jump and open ditch inside the first three fences, and another ditch mid-circuit, horses that jump fluently through that sequence hold the edge — not necessarily front-runners or hold-up types specifically.
Know your race’s actual grade
The BHA’s 2023 handicap reforms reclassified several Doncaster jumps races — the Great Yorkshire Chase and Grimthorpe Chase are now Premier/Class 2 handicaps rather than the graded races some older sources still describe. Check current status before betting on reputation alone.
The Grimthorpe is a genuine National trial
Unlike some so-called “trials,” the Grimthorpe Handicap Chase has real form to back the billing — recent runners have gone on to place at Aintree the following month. Worth tracking notebook horses from this race specifically.
Good drainage keeps the ground fair
Doncaster’s flat, well-draining layout means testing ground is less common here than at many winter jumps tracks — don’t assume a stamina-test bias without checking the actual going first.
Course experience through the ditches is a real edge
A horse that’s already negotiated Doncaster’s specific fence sequence — water jump early, ditches at the 3rd and mid-circuit — without incident is a more reliable proposition than one debuting over the track, regardless of overall class.
Mares’ and novice form here travels to the Festival
The Yorkshire Rose Mares’ Hurdle and River Don Novices’ Hurdle are both genuine Cheltenham prep races — treat strong efforts in either as real signal for March, not just a good local placing.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming Doncaster’s jumps course carries the same strong pace bias as sharper, shorter-run-in tracks — the data doesn’t support a decisive running-style edge here.
- Treating the Great Yorkshire Chase or Grimthorpe Chase as still holding their old graded status after the BHA’s 2023 handicap reclassification.
- Overlooking the fence-sequencing angle — the water jump and open ditches in the first half of the circuit are a more reliable source of trouble than the course’s flat, galloping reputation suggests.
- Assuming Doncaster’s rich Flat heritage (the St Leger) means its NH history is equally deep — jumps racing here was suspended for 35 years and remains a smaller, more recently rebuilt part of the calendar.
Doncaster Racecourse FAQs
Is there a pace or front-running bias at Doncaster over jumps?
How many fences and hurdles are there at Doncaster?
What is the Great Yorkshire Chase?
What’s the best Grand National trial at Doncaster?
Other Jumps Tracks
Aintree
Home of the Grand National — Mildmay and National courses.
Cheltenham
Old Course and New Course — the home of jump racing.
Kempton Park
Sharp, flat right-hander — home of the King George.
Want the thinking behind National Hunt bets?
FormDial posts every selection before the off with its full reasoning: the angle, the price, the logic. See how course analysis feeds into real selections.
The Trackside Companion is your day at the races, written to order — every race on your meeting’s card broken down, plus this track’s draw, angles and people distilled from the guide you’ve just read. Order at least a week before your raceday.
Plan your raceday →