Fontwell Park
National Hunt
West Sussex · Britain’s only figure-of-eight jumps course
Turf
Left-Handed
Figure-of-Eight
Track Breakdown
Fontwell Park’s chase course is a genuine figure-of-eight — the only one left in British jump racing. It’s made of two crossing loops that intersect at a central point, so horses cross that intersection twice per circuit, once travelling in each rotational direction. Despite being classed “left-handed” overall, the layout technically involves both left and right turns. The hurdles course, by contrast, is a completely separate, conventional, fairly sharp left-handed oval of roughly a mile. Both courses share a final run-in of around 230 yards, uphill and veering slightly left — genuinely short for a jumps track, and a real limiting factor on sustained late challenges. A distinctive quirk on the hurdles course: the paddock exit sits halfway up the run-in, and can cause horses to idle or duck out when they spot it.
Founder Alfred Day, a local trainer based nearby since 1887, laid the figure-of-eight out in 1924 specifically to make the best use of an awkwardly-shaped plot of land — a pragmatic solution to a geometry problem, not a deliberate spectacle, though it became a beloved quirk over time. The course opened with its first meeting on 21 May 1924. Fontwell has been owned by Arena Racing Company since 2002, via a chain running from Alfred Day, to solicitor Isidore Kerman by 1970, to his son Andy Kerman, to Northern Racing, to ARC — despite its historic, characterful feel, it has been under corporate ownership for the majority of its hundred-year-plus history, not run by an independent trust.
Course Facts
- Founded 1924, by local trainer Alfred Day
- Ownership Arena Racing Company since 2002, via a chain through the Kerman family and Northern Racing
- Royal history Princess Elizabeth’s (later Queen Elizabeth II) first-ever winner as an owner came here in 1949 with Monaveen — the only horse she and the Queen Mother ever owned jointly
The Circuit
- Shape Chase course: a genuine figure-of-eight, the only one left in Britain. Hurdles course: a separate, conventional oval
- Fences 6 per circuit; no water jump on record
- Run-in Around 230 yards, uphill, shared by both courses — genuinely short
The Racing Calendar
Fontwell’s most talked-about modern moment came on 15 November 2020. Course staff were removing hurdle-marker chevrons after a fallen horse was being treated by vets, and the repositioned markers created an optical illusion that made the third-last hurdle on the final circuit appear to be out of play. Six of the nine runners — including the horse that crossed the line first — missed the obstacle properly and were disqualified; only the one jockey who jumped it correctly was awarded the race. Stewards imposed no penalties on the riders, citing the genuine visibility illusion, and Arena Racing Company reviewed its procedures for guiding runners around treated horses as a result.
Running Style Bias
No published A/E values or strike-rate tables by running style exist for Fontwell — a genuine data gap. What’s consistently reported is qualitative, trip-dependent consensus: over 2-mile chases, the short run-in favours front-runners and prominent racers, since hold-up horses simply don’t have room to sustain a late challenge. Over 3 miles and beyond, that bias softens and can even reverse for proven stayers, particularly when the ground rides heavy and a strong early pace tests the leaders before the final circuit. On the hurdles course specifically, horses that race wide are said to hold an edge in soft or heavy going, regardless of running style. Layered on top of the pure pace picture is a genuine jumping-technique bias from the figure-of-eight itself: agile, quick-jumping types that reset their balance fast between turns do better here than long-striding, out-and-out gallopers.
Run Style Bias — Qualitative, By Trip
Favoured — the short run-in limits sustained closing runs
Bias softens, even reverses, for proven stayers
Treat this as directional, cross-sourced reputation rather than statistical fact — no published dataset backs these bars with hard numbers the way it does at some other courses in this guide series.
Top Trainers & Jockeys
| Trainer | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Moore, Gary and Josh | 1108 | 195 | 17.60% | 409 | 36.91% | 0.91 | -130.05 |
| 2 Gordon, C | 790 | 116 | 14.68% | 263 | 33.29% | 0.96 | -1.60 |
| 3 Mulholland, N P | 592 | 102 | 17.23% | 214 | 36.15% | 0.98 | -29.41 |
| 4 Honeyball, A J | 289 | 88 | 30.45% | 153 | 52.94% | 1.11 | +35.19 |
| 5 Nicholls, P F | 255 | 88 | 34.51% | 141 | 55.29% | 0.98 | -3.13 |
| 6 Snowden, Jamie | 262 | 50 | 19.08% | 108 | 41.22% | 0.96 | -28.74 |
| 7 Mullins, J W | 461 | 44 | 9.54% | 135 | 29.28% | 0.78 | -74.87 |
| 8 Sherwood, O | 210 | 43 | 20.48% | 93 | 44.29% | 1.09 | +46.53 |
| 9 Tizzard, C L | 249 | 41 | 16.47% | 95 | 38.15% | 0.84 | -90.59 |
| 10 King, A | 172 | 40 | 23.26% | 88 | 51.16% | 0.91 | -22.21 |
| 11 Hobbs, P J / White, J | 184 | 39 | 21.20% | 77 | 41.85% | 0.88 | -39.81 |
| 12 Longsdon, C E | 209 | 36 | 17.22% | 84 | 40.19% | 0.92 | -61.31 |
| 13 Skelton, Daniel | 188 | 34 | 18.09% | 69 | 36.70% | 0.81 | -44.36 |
| 14 O’Neill, Jonjo and AJ | 185 | 34 | 18.38% | 71 | 38.38% | 0.98 | -35.30 |
| 15 Vaughan, Tim | 221 | 33 | 14.93% | 63 | 28.51% | 0.76 | -85.43 |
| 16 Henderson, N J | 123 | 33 | 26.83% | 58 | 47.15% | 0.92 | -28.44 |
| 17 Pipe, D E | 208 | 29 | 13.94% | 61 | 29.33% | 0.74 | -61.98 |
| 18 Walford, Robert | 167 | 29 | 17.37% | 64 | 38.32% | 1.22 | +25.18 |
| 19 Fry, Harry | 108 | 29 | 26.85% | 50 | 46.30% | 1.01 | -8.86 |
| 20 Lavelle, Miss E C | 180 | 28 | 15.56% | 69 | 38.33% | 0.85 | -27.66 |
| Jockey | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Moore, Jamie | 689 | 106 | 15.38% | 219 | 31.79% | 0.89 | -166.57 |
| 2 Cannon, Tom J | 730 | 104 | 14.25% | 242 | 33.15% | 0.99 | -91.08 |
| 3 Johnson, Richard | 327 | 77 | 23.55% | 153 | 46.79% | 0.98 | +20.00 |
| 4 Sheehan, Gavin | 296 | 66 | 22.30% | 118 | 39.86% | 1.06 | +20.07 |
| 5 Aspell, Leighton | 435 | 62 | 14.25% | 171 | 39.31% | 0.92 | -35.47 |
| 6 Twiston-Davies, Sam | 286 | 62 | 21.68% | 111 | 38.81% | 0.92 | -20.11 |
| 7 Moore, Joshua | 343 | 57 | 16.62% | 126 | 36.73% | 1.02 | +83.83 |
| 8 Coleman, A | 257 | 55 | 21.40% | 119 | 46.30% | 0.95 | -26.50 |
| 9 Goldstein, Marc | 530 | 48 | 9.06% | 118 | 22.26% | 1.06 | +50.92 |
| 10 Powell, Brendan | 395 | 48 | 12.15% | 119 | 30.13% | 0.84 | +44.69 |
| 11 Fehily, Noel | 181 | 43 | 23.76% | 81 | 44.75% | 0.94 | -4.85 |
| 12 Scholfield, Nick | 300 | 39 | 13.00% | 88 | 29.33% | 0.90 | -33.10 |
| 13 Cobden, Harry | 175 | 39 | 22.29% | 73 | 41.71% | 0.83 | -40.34 |
| 14 Scudamore, Tom | 211 | 38 | 18.01% | 79 | 37.44% | 0.87 | -38.75 |
| 15 Jacob, Daryl | 184 | 38 | 20.65% | 75 | 40.76% | 0.97 | -22.51 |
| 16 McCoy, A P | 131 | 38 | 29.01% | 64 | 48.85% | 0.96 | -13.29 |
| 17 Dingle, Rex | 199 | 35 | 17.59% | 75 | 37.69% | 0.88 | -18.89 |
| 18 O’Brien, T J | 265 | 34 | 12.83% | 74 | 27.92% | 0.85 | -30.10 |
| 19 Skelton, Harry | 135 | 32 | 23.70% | 58 | 42.96% | 0.98 | -6.52 |
| 20 Best, J A | 273 | 31 | 11.36% | 59 | 21.61% | 1.15 | -56.82 |
Top Sires
| Sire | Runs | Wins | Win% | Places | Place% | A/E | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Midnight Legend | 321 | 61 | 19.00% | 120 | 37.38% | 1.15 | +78.27 |
| 2 King’s Theatre (IRE) | 274 | 54 | 19.71% | 103 | 37.59% | 1.03 | -41.80 |
| 3 Kayf Tara | 310 | 44 | 14.19% | 104 | 33.55% | 0.82 | -99.04 |
| 4 Milan | 321 | 43 | 13.40% | 104 | 32.40% | 0.73 | -102.09 |
| 5 Presenting | 323 | 39 | 12.07% | 107 | 33.13% | 0.72 | -174.41 |
| 6 Shirocco (GER) | 182 | 34 | 18.68% | 62 | 34.07% | 1.15 | +45.42 |
| 7 Getaway (GER) | 164 | 30 | 18.29% | 59 | 35.98% | 1.01 | -2.88 |
| 8 Yeats (IRE) | 155 | 30 | 19.35% | 59 | 38.06% | 1.01 | +5.83 |
| 9 Westerner | 199 | 29 | 14.57% | 63 | 31.66% | 0.83 | -98.39 |
| 10 Flemensfirth (USA) | 211 | 28 | 13.27% | 61 | 28.91% | 0.76 | -8.16 |
| 11 Beneficial | 199 | 22 | 11.06% | 63 | 31.66% | 0.60 | -96.03 |
| 12 Mahler | 157 | 21 | 13.38% | 48 | 30.57% | 0.81 | -64.24 |
| 13 Old Vic | 109 | 21 | 19.27% | 39 | 35.78% | 0.95 | -31.70 |
| 14 Shantou (USA) | 135 | 20 | 14.81% | 54 | 40.00% | 0.83 | -52.12 |
| 15 Court Cave (IRE) | 126 | 20 | 15.87% | 49 | 38.89% | 0.96 | -29.86 |
| 16 Soldier Of Fortune (IRE) | 83 | 19 | 22.89% | 35 | 42.17% | 1.05 | +9.43 |
| 17 Califet (FR) | 60 | 19 | 31.67% | 28 | 46.67% | 1.47 | +17.69 |
| 18 Oscar (IRE) | 227 | 18 | 7.93% | 54 | 23.79% | 0.51 | -160.44 |
| 19 Martaline | 78 | 18 | 23.08% | 28 | 35.90% | 1.09 | +12.83 |
| 20 Sixties Icon | 121 | 17 | 14.05% | 34 | 28.10% | 1.05 | -7.83 |
Betting Angles
Gary Moore Is the Course Specialist to Follow
The Horsham-based trainer’s family operation recurs across multiple independent datasets as having the highest strike rate of any active trainer here.
The Figure-of-Eight Rewards Agile Jumpers
Quick, balanced types who reset fast between turns hold a real edge over long-striding gallopers.
The Short Run-in Favours the Front, Mostly
Especially over 2 miles — but 3-mile-plus trips on heavy ground can flip the balance toward proven stayers.
Dunn and Walford Are the Value Yards
Mrs Alex Dunn (A/E 1.85, +30.76) and Robert Walford (A/E 1.46, +48.36) beat the market here; Olly Murphy (A/E 0.72) and the Greatrex/Harris/Lavelle cluster (A/E 0.74) are the fades.
Marc Goldstein Is the Standout Rider
Goldstein returns A/E 1.60 and +138.25 from 124 rides, with Harry Kimber (A/E 1.42) and Adam Wedge (A/E 1.29) also profitable; Jamie Moore and Niall Houlihan (both A/E 0.80) are over-bet.
Shirocco Beats Getaway on Value
Shirocco (GER) clears fair value (A/E 1.18, +16.94) where Getaway (GER) only breaks even (A/E 1.00); Sea The Stars (IRE) (A/E 1.74) and Califet (FR) (A/E 1.53) stand out too, while Westerner (A/E 0.75) and Milan (A/E 0.62) are the fades.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming the whole track is figure-of-eight. Only the chase course is — the hurdles course is a completely separate, conventional oval.
- Inventing a precise front-runner-vs-hold-up percentage split. The bias is well-supported qualitatively and is genuinely trip-dependent, but no published A/E or strike-rate data exists for this course.
- Assuming Fontwell is independently run given its historic, quirky feel. It’s been Arena Racing Company-owned since 2002, following a corporate chain stretching back to 1970.
Fontwell Park Racecourse FAQs
Why does Fontwell have a figure-of-eight course?
What happened at Fontwell in November 2020?
Is there a pace bias at Fontwell?
Who owns Fontwell Park?
Other Jumps Tracks
Sandown Park
Right-handed, home of the Betfair Tingle Creek Chase and the Railway Fences.
Exeter
Right-handed, Britain’s highest racecourse.
Cheltenham
Old Course and New Course — the home of jump racing.
Want the thinking behind National Hunt bets?
FormDial posts every selection before the off with its full reasoning: the angle, the price, the logic. See how course analysis feeds into real selections.
The Trackside Companion is your day at the races, written to order — every race on your meeting’s card broken down, plus this track’s draw, angles and people distilled from the guide you’ve just read. Order at least a week before your raceday.
Plan your raceday →